Biblical Scholar: Born and Bred
November 28, 2006
In first grade I memorized many things. So many things, in fact, I can’t even remember them all - clearly it worked well. What I do remember memorizing is the Lord’s Prayer and Psalm 23. Both are prayers/psalms that just roll off the tongue and I don’t ever remembering reading them - as I found out today in class, belatedly.
We had to write one page on Psalm 23. Simple. Except it’s not really my favorite - never has been - too used, too lovely, who knows, no good reason. So, for one page, I focused on the one part that I do like, the second phrase of the first line - ‘I shall not want.’ Herein lies the problem. I have always thought ‘I shall not want’ refers to the Shepherd, not actually not wanting anything.
As a side note, I’d like to point out that when you do not provide an object, it does not unreasonable to assume the object being referred to is the one in the previous clause. Just saying . . .
So, I wrote a whole paper on how I appreciated the fact that sometimes we don’t want the rest and care offered to us. Apparently there is a comma and apparently the comma is traditionally taken to separate the clauses so that the object of the first clause is not the object of the second clause. Apparently I shall not want actually means I shall not want - like not want anything. Sigh.
I think I’m ready to be done with this semester.
Posted in 



i hear you said:
November 29th, 2006 at 9:00 am
sometimes I think the best things we can do as preachers and writers is to take a totally different spin on a very familiar passage. It gets people to think, to see things a little differently. It might open a passage to someone who has written it off from their lives because it doesn’t speak to them or their current situation. Leaving out the comma puts the whole passage in a new perspective (i looked it up).
I survived the academics of seminary; I’m sure you will too.
Tom said:
November 29th, 2006 at 8:38 pm
I think you have finally lost your mind.